A few years ago I commented negatively on the use of a blowtorch for drying holds, saying that it may all be well and good in the hands of expert climbers, but some young idiot is going to see your example and think that you basically fry the hold till its dry. Rock being formed by heat and pressure, so adding one of those will invariably damage the rock. I got a lot of stick for that comment made in a pub a few years back, but I did stand by my convictions and a few years later it was seen as a bad thing. My thoughts are that if it is too wet to climb then its too wet to climb, we live in Wales so deal with it.
I have every respect for Simon Panton, and all the work that he does, however from time to time mine and his opinions differ radically, in one of his latest news items on North Wales Bouldering Simon congratulates as public spirited the work (depends on your view point) of Ted Kingnorth, for repairing a hold on Pill Box Wall. Again I have to disagree with Simon, difficult as he is currently editing a guidebook that I am (Possible not anymore!) co-authoring for him. However I have a simple belief that gluing holds is unnecessary, and sends out the wrong message entirely.
Do we really need to DIY/Bodge it and scarper on our rock, or should we just let time and attrition take the routes from us. If the hold fell off, would another hold or different sequence appear? Who knows it might even be harder/better? I love bouldering, but not sure that any route is worth sticking back together, when its gone its gone. A view of the first five minutes of Amateur Hardcore shows you that the rock is friable (Witness Nodder ‘pulling down the crag’)
If you look at the picture here, it looks like a right hatchet job at the moment, I appreciate that it needs some work, but given that the worry was the hold won’t be the same if it falls off, it seems the hold simply won’t be the same full stop now. Its a tricky one but not sure whether this was covered by the BMC ten commandments of bouldering, either way it doesn’t seem like it is in keeping with the general idea, or ethos of them. I have to say from a recreational (read punter as I have only bouldered V9), rather than obsessive (read dedicated) boulderer, I don’t think this should be encouraged in anyway, as it sends the wrong message to people who may not have the experience to make the right judgement.
As is often the way, in climbing, it is often alright for the elite to do what the hell they like, yet the mere mortals are expected to toe the line. Climbing is anarchy, there are no rules, so make of this what you will. I have done a few things people object to and taken the criticism on the chin.
If you visit this blog regularly you’ll have noticed this post was pulled for a while. Unfortunately in my haste to get something online, after challenging myself to get some written everyday, I managed to really upset Simon Panton, having re-read the post I realised exactly why, however I do believe that’s it is ironic to glue a hold to avoid altering and alter it in the process. However the original post read like I was accusing Simon of ‘advocating using a blow torch’ which wasn’t something that I actually meant or believed, it was a bit of a gross misuse of the English language, something that if you read this blog will be apparent that it a skill set that I possess in bucket loads.
I’d like to offer Simon my apologies, and have re-edited the post, to remove the offence and hopefully rectify it by offering this apology. Similarly I have remove the reference to vandalism to the gluing, as it is again a strong use of language that will have cause Ted some offence. Simon pointed out to me that I didn’t take criticism on the chin when I was faced with the Kangaroo Court that is UKC, instead I eventually after several months of abuse, of which Simon was one of my main defenders, I ‘spat my dumby’ and walked away from re-equipping the Slate Quarries. Climbing does need people like Ted who will get of their arse, and actually do something, even if it something that I disagree with.
My point of this post was really that firstly ‘I’ disagreed with it, and that it was rather ironic in trying to fix it something so not to change it and in the process probably change it. Also the making public knowledge of the activity by North Wales Bouldering made idiots like me aware of it, and able to comment, also the issues around reinforcing holds is a difficult one, and requires a lot of ethical consideration often only possible by people with a great deal of experience. By publicising it does it make it seem like gluing holds is a common, everyday thing and worthy of praise to the less experienced climber?
Simon offered the argument that people have been providing maintenance to limestone boulder problems and to that I would like to add routes since the 1980’s. Which is something that neither he nor myself put in our original comments. However I would add that just because it has happened for years and years doesn’t make it right. At times throughout history (both climbing and real life) we have looked back and said well we might have done this before, but maybe its not the actual answer.
Undoubtedly I am wrong, but hence my reference to blow torching at the beginning of this article, which has since become obsolete. Simon too fought tooth and nail to get people to realise that ‘wire brushing’ was just another way to manufacture a decent hold out of virtually nothing, he also developed the bouldering ten commandments for the BMC. Whilst I am not going to fight ‘tooth and nail’ over this argument, I am just offering a counter point to the encouragement of such an activity, sadly in doing so I upset both Simon and Ted, sorry to both of you guys.